3c认证

“枫”景这边独好——绥中县前卫镇东大村“三日跟进”工作法推进矛盾纠纷排查化解的实践_我的网站

A |     “枫”景这边独好          　　——绥中县前卫镇东大村“三日跟进”工作法推进矛盾纠纷排查化解的实践                    　　编者按 基层社会治理是实现治理体系和治理能力现代化的基础工程，它一头连着经济社会发展，一头连着千家万户冷暖。    

    Illustration: Liu Rui/GT
China strongly deplores Japan's negative moves related to the Yasukuni war shrine, and has lodged serious protests against Japan, a Chinese Foreign Ministry (FM) spokesperson said in a statement on Saturday, in response to Japanese politicians paying respects to the Yasukuni war shrine, which honors Class-A war criminals, on the 81st anniversary of Japan's unconditional surrender in World War II.
On such a sensitive day, Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi sent a ritual offering to the notorious Yasukuni shrine, while Defense Minister Shinjiro Koizumi and several senior executives of the ruling Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) visited in person, prompting Chinese experts to warn that Japan's increasingly brazen moves signal a dangerous shift toward neo-militarism.
Takaichi made a "tamagushi" ritual offering to the notorious shrine using her private funds in her capacity as LDP president, Japan's Kyodo News reported Saturday, citing LDP Secretary-General Shunichi Suzuki. Takaichi did not visit the shrine in person. Koizumi, however, visited the notorious shrine Saturday morning. Hitoshi Kikawada, a member of Takaichi's Cabinet, also visited the shrine.
Meanwhile, Suzuki, LDP General Council Chairperson Haruko Arimura and Election Strategy Committee Chairperson Yasutoshi Nishimura visited the shrine together on Saturday, according to Kyodo News and the Xinhua News Agency. 
Japan's Mainichi Shimbun on Saturday described the collective August 15 visit by senior LDP executives as "unusual."
Chinese media including state broadcaster CCTV reported that it marked the first collective visit to the shrine by senior LDP executives.
Yasukuni Shrine, located in central Tokyo's Chiyoda Ward, honors 14 convicted Japanese Class-A war criminals from World War II. It has long been a source of diplomatic friction between Japan and its neighbors. For a long time, visits and ritual offerings made by Japanese officials to the controversial shrine have consistently sparked criticism and opposition both at home and abroad, hurting the feelings of the people of China, South Korea, and other countries and regions victimized by Japan's wartime aggression, according to Xinhua.
An affront to historical justice
"No pretext whatsoever can hide the Japanese politicians' true intention which is to change the verdict on the war criminals, cover up Japan's war crimes, distort the historical facts, and pave the way for accelerating remilitarization. This is an affront to historical justice, a challenge to the foundational norms of civilization, and a provocation against the postwar international order. Such behaviors have been firmly rejected by the overwhelming majority of the international community," the Chinese FM spokesperson's statement said on Saturday.
This year marks the 80th anniversary of the opening of the Tokyo Trials. To view and treat history correctly is an important prerequisite for Japan's postwar return to the international community, the political foundation for Japan's ties with neighboring countries, and more importantly, a key measure for Japan's commitment to peaceful development, the statement noted.  
"We urge the Japanese side to do serious soul-searching on its history of aggression, make a clean break with militarism, and earn trust from its Asian neighbors and the rest of the world with concrete actions," the spokesperson said.
Lü Chao, an expert on East Asian studies and a professor at the Liaoning Academy of Social Sciences, told the Global Times on Saturday that attitudes toward the notorious Yasukuni shrine on this very day have long served as an important "touchstone" for the international community to judge whether Japanese political forces genuinely recognize the country's wartime aggression and responsibility. 
"What is particularly alarming this year is how openly these political signals are being sent," Lü said. "The combination of an offering by the prime minister, a visit by the sitting defense minister and a coordinated appearance by senior ruling-party executives means the issue can hardly be dismissed merely as individual acts of mourning."
Although Takaichi stayed away in person, Lü said the offering still clearly demonstrated her political attitude. "Not visiting personally does not fundamentally change the political nature of the gesture," Lü said, noting that diplomatic and domestic pressure may have affected the form Takaichi chose, but not necessarily her underlying position.
Particular attention required
"The collective actions of senior figures in the ruling party deserve particular attention," he said. "They raise the question of whether Japan's political establishment has truly developed a correct understanding of its aggression and wartime crimes."
Chinese military affairs expert Song Zhongping told the Global Times on Saturday that visits by Japanese conservative lawmakers and government officials to the notorious shrine are not new and should not be treated as an isolated development unique to the Takaichi administration.
Former prime minister Junichiro Koizumi repeatedly visited the shrine and went there as prime minister on August 15, 2006. Shinzo Abe visited as sitting prime minister in December 2013. Shinjiro Koizumi himself visited on August 15, 2025, when he was agriculture minister.  
"The important point is that this tendency has persisted within Japanese right-wing politics for decades," Song said. "What we are seeing now is not its sudden emergence, but its increasingly overt expression." 
Song further noted that the political significance of Koizumi's visit is amplified by his current position as defense minister. "A defense minister's understanding of wartime history cannot simply be regarded as a private attitude," he said. "It inevitably leads people to ask what kind of direction Japan's defense policy and Self-Defense Forces may take."
Such concern comes as the Takaichi government pushes to strengthen Japan's military capabilities and pursue constitutional revision.
Song stressed that Japan has already expanded defense spending, developed so-called counterstrike capabilities and eased restrictions on defense equipment transfers under the existing Constitution, meaning constitutional revision should not inaccurately be portrayed as a legal prerequisite for all such measures.
What deserves greater scrutiny, he said, is whether historical revisionism, constitutional revision and military expansion are increasingly reinforcing one another.
"The issue surrounding the notorious Yasukuni Shrine is not simply one of mourning," Song said. "When political forces refuse to squarely confront the history of aggression while simultaneously seeking greater military capabilities and fewer postwar restraints, neighboring countries have every reason to remain vigilant."
。创新推广“三日跟进”工作法，使基层纠纷就近就便及时化解，确保矛盾不升级、问题不上交，人民群众的安全感和满意度不断提升，绥中县前卫镇东大村为坚持和发展新时代“枫桥经验”探索出了一条新路。                   　　《日报》全媒体记者 刘丹 王萍                    　　“李大哥，在家呢！这是我刚买的酒，咱俩喝点。

B | ”6月11日上午，绥中县前卫镇东大村村民李某正在院里忙活，朱某拿着一瓶酒，进门就热情地打起招呼。                   　　“快进屋，等我再炒两个菜。”李某高兴地回应道。                   　　谁能想到，就在一个多月前，两人还在为“一根垄”的事而吵得面红耳赤，互不相让。                   　　4月16日，网格员在下片走访时，发现村民李某和朱某因翻地发生纠纷，争执不下。

C | 原来李某和朱某的大田相邻，朱某认为李某现在的大田地界存在偏差，李某多占用了自己一根垄（垄宽50厘米）。李某则认为自己的土地地界没问题，是朱某强词夺理。                   　　网格员制止了二人的争吵，对双方进行耐心劝导后，将此事上报给东大村人民调解委员会。                   　　次日，调解委员会进行了实地测量，发现李某和朱某的土地面积均大于土地台账所记录的面积，通过调查发现，朱某耕地位置紧贴道路边界，多出的土地是其开垦的荒地，所以土地面积与台账相比，多是正常的。而李某的土地位置位于中部，无法进行开荒，所以李某的土地面积大于台账面积，于理不合。                   　　面对事实，李某承认侵占了朱某一根垄土地，并同意归还。

D |                    　　4月19日，网格员进行跟进回访，发现李某情绪低落。通过交谈得知，李某之所以占朱某一根垄，是因为朱某开荒时将原本在朱李两家的排水沟填平，造成李某家土地在去年下雨时被淹。

E | 为了弥补损失，李某故意占用朱某一根垄。

F | 而朱某的土地紧贴路边，排水不成问题。“我虽然无理，但心里也感觉憋屈。”李某说。

G |                    　　得知情况后，调解人员再次来到朱家。

H | 朱某承认了填平排水沟的事实。

I | 经过商讨，朱某同意调解委员会将排水沟恢复的建议。次日，村委会雇用钩机一台，将原有的排水沟进行修复，解决了李某家土地的排水问题。                   　　4月23日，网格员第三次回访，看到朱某正在那一根垄上种植花生，李某则在旁边帮着忙前忙后。                   　　这起普通的邻里矛盾纠纷得到解决，得益于近年来东大村在排查、化解、回访等环节积极探索，创新“三日跟进”工作法，及时发现矛盾将隐患消灭在萌芽状态，进而实现“小事不出村，矛盾不上交”。这也是新时代“枫桥经验”在东大村的生动实践和真实写照。                   　　“东大村地处前卫镇中心，东临高速口，北临102国道，流动人口多，人员结构复杂，综合治理难度大。” 村党总支书记张阔介绍，尤其是近两年，京哈高速扩建、凌绥高速建设工程均在该村附近，引发的矛盾纠纷较多。对此，东大村党总支充分发挥网格员“人熟、地熟、情况熟”的优势，依托“村‘两委’-驻村辅警-网格员”全链条摸排网格，结合日常巡查，常态化进行入户走访，实现矛盾纠纷排查“入户全覆盖”。                   　　在全面摸排矛盾纠纷建立台账的基础上，他们根据矛盾纠纷的类型，合理配置资源，由村“两委”成员为主导，协调公安派出所、司法所、政法委员、包村干部、驻村辅警、网格员及乡镇各部门多方力量，发现纠纷及时调解，提高化解效率。                   　　在这一过程中，他们发现有些纠纷调解后容易出现反复发生的现象，且反复后矛盾会愈演愈烈，调解难度增大。针对这一情况，东大村根据长期以来的工作经验，2022年创新“三日跟进”工作法，即化解的矛盾纠纷由村“两委”、网格员、辅警对双方当事人进行七天三次的跟进回访（化解后的第一日、第三日、第七日）。对回访时发现双方当事人依然存在不满情绪的，进一步开展化解工作，防止“案解事未了”，出现矛盾再激化现象，全面提高矛盾纠纷排查化解质效。                   　　为什么在第一日、第三日、第七日进行回访? 张阔说，最初回访时间定在矛盾化解后的第一日、第二日、第四日，后来发现有些性格内向的村民即使心存不满，也不会很快表达出来，连续三日跟进的工作方式还存在一定缺陷。在回访当事人时，发现有些情况是当事人邻居、好友反映的，经过多次商讨、反复修改，最后把“回访日”确定为第一日、第三日、第七日。三次回访当事人，也改为两次回访当事人、一次向邻里或好友了解情况，这样不仅让调解人员能够充分掌握当事人的心理动态，也使矛盾纠纷化解得更加彻底。                   　　自实施“三日跟进”工作法以来，东大村连续两年无上访、无民转刑案件、无矛盾纠纷上交，矛盾纠纷化解成功率明显提高，矛盾纠纷发生率大幅度降低。2023年，该村矛盾纠纷化解成功率由不足90%提升至95.5%，矛盾纠纷发生率与上一年相比下降了22%。今年以来，东大村依托“三日跟进”工作法，成功化解了10余起村民与高速公路施工方之间的矛盾纠纷。                     　　“绥中县平安建设领导小组办公室已在5月下发文件，全面推广东大村‘三日跟进’工作法，并组织村‘两委’、辅警、网格员学习和落实，以此有效解决‘久调不决、调后反复、案结事未了’等难题，切实将矛盾纠纷化解于基层。”绥中县政法委相关负责人说。

Current article:http://www.hanninhuaxituochunkui.pics/jng/20260826/85005.xlsx

Published on:06:25:16