黑吃黑
骑士引进沃特森后续：必然续约哈登 起薪2590万需他大幅降薪_我的网站
一 |
Chinese experts on Sunday slammed India's latest move of identifying 27 locations in China's Zangnan area by their so-called standard names on its official map as self-deception, which runs counter to the improving momentum in bilateral relations and could complicate efforts to properly handle border issues.
The Indian government on Friday said the updated Survey of India map included "four mountain passes and a high-altitude lake," and claimed that the move "is intended to ensure the correct identification of these places" and "improve public awareness of their geographical and historical significance," according to the Times of India.
The claim came shortly after the 36th meeting of the Working Mechanism for Consultation and Coordination on China-India Border Affairs (WMCC) was held on August 6 in New Delhi.
During the meeting, officials from both sides discussed issues including boundary delimitation, border management and control, mechanism building, and cross-border cooperation. They agreed to maintain communication through diplomatic and military channels and jointly safeguard peace and stability in the border areas, according to a statement released by the Chinese Foreign Ministry on Friday.
China has been carrying out standardization of geographical names in the region for a long time. At a time when China-India relations are showing signs of improvement and leaders from both countries are expected to engage through multilateral platforms, any unilateral action by India that escalates the border situation shows no point and will not serve the broader interests of bilateral relations, Qian Feng, director of the Research Department at Tsinghua University's National Strategy Institute, told the Global Times on Sunday.
Qian said India should avoid turning border issue into a larger dispute, as such actions could stifle the improving political ties between the two countries.
Consistent position
China's position on the Zangnan region is consistent. The area covers parts of Nyingchi and Shannan and is located in Southwest China's Xizang region, which has been China's territory since ancient times.
Since 2017, China's Ministry of Civil Affairs has released six batches of standardized names for locations in Zangnan, with a total of 112 names announced as of April 2026. These names cover villages, mountain passes, rivers and peaks, accompanied by standardized Chinese and Tibetan names as well as geographic coordinates.
The dispute over the region has a long historical background. The illegal "McMahon Line" drawn between China and India during the 1914 Simla Convention was never signed or recognized by successive Chinese governments and therefore has no legal validity.
After China's Ministry of Civil Affairs published the sixth batch of names that should be used for places in Zangnan region on April 10, two days later, the spokesperson for India's Ministry of External Affairs expressed rejection to China assigning names to places in so-called "Arunachal Pradesh," adding that these actions detract from ongoing efforts to stabilize bilateral ties.
Chinese Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Guo Jiakun said at a routine press briefing on April 14 that Zangnan region is China's territory. China does not recognize the so-called "Arunachal Pradesh" illegally set up by India. It is fully within China's sovereign rights for the Chinese government to issue standard names for some of the places in Zangnan.
China-India relations are generally stable at the moment. China's commitment to improving and growing China-India relations has not changed. We hope the two sides will work in the same direction and act more in ways conducive to bilateral relations, Guo stressed.
India's latest naming of 27 locations is a unilateral administrative move and does not alter the legal status of the area, Guo Xuetang, a professor at the center for South Asia and Indian Ocean Studies under Shanghai International Studies University, told the Global Times.
According to Guo Xuetang, India's move is an attempt to strengthen its claim of control over the area and create additional leverage in future boundary negotiations. However, such actions have no practical meaning and will only undermine the atmosphere for negotiations between the two countries.
Not merely from the perspective of international law, Zangnan region has culturally, religiously and historically been connected within Xizang, with close links between local communities and civilization, the expert stressed.
Positive momentum
Despite differences over the boundary issue, China and India have in recent months continued efforts to stabilize relations. In December 2024, China and India's representatives for boundary affairs reached a six-point consensus during talks.
Last week, the Nathu La Pass, which was closed for six years, officially resumed operations, signaling a new phase of mutually beneficial cooperation and development in cross-border trade.
During a meeting between Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi and Indian Foreign Minister Subrahmanyam Jaishankar on July 22 in Manila, the Philippines, Wang said China and India should consolidate the positive momentum in bilateral relations, and strengthen coordination and cooperation in international and regional affairs, while Jaishankar said India's positions on issues concerning Taiwan and Xizang have not changed, and that India respects China's sovereignty, Xinhua reported.
In the past two years, leaders of China and India have met in Kazan, Russia, and Tianjin, China, and agreed that China and India are partners rather than rivals, and that their development should be viewed as opportunities rather than threats, Wang said.
"India's latest move is essentially an attempt to reinforce its claims over disputed territory and counter China's sovereignty position, a move that amounts to self-deception. Unilateral name changes cannot alter the historical and legal facts surrounding the Zangnan region, nor can they shake China's resolve to safeguard its territorial sovereignty," Guo Xuetang said.
The only way to resolve the China-India boundary issue is through equal negotiations and a fair settlement based on historical and legal principles, while unilateral actions that create tensions or change the status quo will only harm mutual trust and border stability, Guo said.
。 骑士、快船、掘金达成三方交易协议，具体框架是骑士得到佩顿·沃特森，快船得到斯特鲁斯，掘金得到骑士2031年的首轮签以及一个2032年的次轮签（来自国王）。 沃特森加盟骑士是通过先签后换，他签下一份4年价值8800万美元的合同，包括球员选项和交易保证金，起薪最低2050万美元。 尽管骑士在这笔交易中失去了斯特鲁斯，但是沃特森能完美填补其空缺，无论是持球进攻还是单兵防守，沃特森都在斯特鲁斯之上，而且他更年轻，上限更高。 上赛季，沃特森在掘金打出生涯代表作，场均轰下14.6分、4.9个篮板、1.1次盖帽，场均以41.1%的准星投进1.5个三分。很多人以为沃特森是在约基奇身边才打出如此表现，事实上，沃特森赛季表现最佳的那段时间恰好是约基奇伤停时，他交出了华丽数据，攻防一体。 上赛季，沃特森是西部第一个达成50+50+50（抢断+盖帽+三分球）的球员。可惜，赛季后期沃特森腿筋受伤，还缺席了季后赛。 今年休赛期，詹姆斯·哈登迟迟没有跟骑士续约，就是在等骑士完成沃特森交易。如今，骑士如愿，接下来就看骑士给哈登一份多大的合同了。
二 | 按照劳资协议规定，骑士先签后换引进沃特森后会被第一土豪线硬帽，如此一来，他们能给哈登的起薪大约为2590万美元。如果他们将不久前刚刚换来的特雷·曼恩通过延伸特例的方式裁掉，他们能腾出更多空间，但也多不到哪里去。 哈登上赛季年薪3945万美元，今夏本来拥有一个价值4232万美元的球员选项，为了帮骑士引援，哈登放弃球员选项。接下来，他必然要大幅降薪。
Current article:http://www.hanninhuaxituochunkui.pics/list_5vm/aj5e.xlsx
Published on:06:06:55