主页 > 国内 >

蓝山球队第一季

China proceeds legislation against cross-border corruption, closing legal gap in overseas probe, fugitive hunt and asset recovery: expert_我的网站

地球上最后一个人

A |     今日,CBS Sports记者Sam Quinn更新社媒,提到了布劳恩和沃特森的合约对比:          “沃特森先签后换加盟骑士,新合同四年8800万,平均年薪2200万;布劳恩去年和掘金签下五年1.25亿合约,平均年薪2500万。    

    
An animated picture features Chinese law enforcement official tracking back a fugitive who flees overseas with his ill-gotten asset during the Skynet operations, China's project to track down fugitives. Photo:VCG
    An animated picture features Chinese law enforcement official tracking back a fugitive who flees overseas with his ill-gotten asset during the Skynet operations, China's project to track down fugitives. Photo:VCG
Chinese lawmakers began reviewing a draft law on combating cross-border corruption on Tuesday, a legislation which experts believe would help close legal gaps in investigating overseas corruption, pursuing fugitives and recovering illicit assets, while strengthening international cooperation and corporate compliance.
The draft was submitted for its first reading to the ongoing session of the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress, the country's top legislature, per Xinhua News Agency.
Huo Zhengxin, a professor at the China University of Political Science and Law, told the Global Times that the draft law represents a dedicated piece of legislation within China's anti-corruption legal framework and a major step forward in the country's law-based governance of foreign-related affairs. It will fill a legislative gap in combating cross-border corruption, Huo said.
As Chinese companies expand business overseas, cross-border corruption cases face challenges in obtaining evidence abroad, pursuing fugitives and recovering illicit assets. Existing anti-corruption laws have faced limitations in addressing such cases involving foreign affairs, making such dedicated legislation necessary, Huo said. 
Structured into six chapters and 47 articles, the draft sets out the principles, scope and key provisions underpinning China's efforts to combat cross-border corruption. It also defines relevant operational mechanisms and institutional responsibilities, and seeks to strengthen case handling and international cooperation.
The draft further clarifies enterprises' obligations regarding integrity and compliance, and specifies legal liabilities for violations.
As one of the experts involved in drafting the legislation, Huo said a key innovation of the draft is to strengthen international cooperation and corporate integrity and compliance obligations. As evidence, suspects and illicit assets in cross-border corruption cases are often located overseas, the draft provides mechanisms including extradition, mutual legal assistance and repatriation, while aligning with relevant rules under the UN Convention against Corruption (UNCAC), said the expert.
The draft also makes clear that Chinese companies operating overseas, including both state-owned and private enterprises, have legal obligations to uphold integrity and compliance with domestic laws, Huo said.
The legislation would also codify practices accumulated through China's past campaigns against cross-border corruption, such as Sky Net and Fox Hunt operations, turning them into a more systematic legal framework and strengthening the law's deterrent effect, according to Huo.
The draft law is a practical step to regulate the development of cross-border businesses and help build a world-class business environment aligned with market principles, the rule of law and international standards, Xinhua noted.
It is also expected to expand the legal tools available to combat cross-border corruption and help address challenges in detecting corruption, collecting evidence, recovering illicit assets and securing convictions, according to the report.
In January, CCTV News reported on the case of a former senior executive of China National Offshore Oil Corporation, who was accused of accepting large amounts of bribes that were concealed overseas, with a businessman allegedly acting as a "front" to collect the illicit payments.
The draft's explicit corporate integrity and compliance requirements would make it harder for individuals to disguise bribery and other corrupt practices through overseas projects in an attempt to circumvent domestic oversight, while further clarifying the extraterritorial reach of China's anti-corruption laws, Huo said.
The draft also contains provisions to counter the use of foreign countries' domestic anti-corruption laws to exercise "long-arm jurisdiction" over Chinese companies, which Huo described as another important innovation in China's foreign-related legal framework.
China has been deepening its efforts in international anti-corruption cooperation, with 963 corrupt fugitives repatriated to the country in 2025, according to a work report from the country's top anti-graft body, Xinhua reported.

。”          随后美媒lockedupjb评论:          “没有开玩笑,这份合同直接毁了掘金。”          很明显,对于布劳恩,大多数声音都觉得五年1.25亿不合适;很难不让人提问:          布劳恩真的配得上这份合同吗?          理性来看,如果只看签约前的24-25赛季,其实这也不算什么垃圾合同。         当赛季布劳恩出战79场,其中77场首发,场均出场33.9分钟,基础数据15.4分5.2篮板2.6助攻1.1抢断,三项命中率58%+39.7%+82.7%。         作为年轻即战力,这样的进攻效率确实值得大合约;特别是对比成长速度看,前一个赛季还只是替补角色,场均7.3分3.7篮板1.6助攻,而一个休赛期后,进攻产量直接翻了一倍多。掘金愿意在他身上押注未来,确实也有迹可循。         而当赛季波普离队,球队侧翼需要有人补上短板,而布劳恩出现的也恰到好处。

B |          但问题刚好出现在这里,掘金看好布劳恩能稳定成长;但尴尬的是,拿到大合同后,布劳恩很快遭遇伤病问题。         由于左脚踝韧带撕裂,整个常规赛布劳恩只出战44场,场均31.8分钟,场均12分4.8篮板2.7助攻,三项命中率51.9%+30.1%+78.2%。         虽然下跌幅度不大,但对于约基奇而言就不是一个小问题了。         作为球队持球核心,他的很大一部分价值就在于通过持球策应盘活队友进攻,但如果身边的人不具备足够进攻威胁,约基奇的进攻价值必然随之缩水。         特别是到了季后赛,这个问题更是被严重放大。         首轮面对森林狼,布劳恩出战6场,场均8.3分3.5篮板1.7助攻,三项命中率41.7%+42.9%+73.7%。特别是后四场比赛,布劳恩的得分分别只有2分、8分、9分、3分。         很明显,在球队需要有人站出来时,布劳恩确实做不到,甚至于在他的进攻威胁下降后,直接影响到全队进攻,这才是掘金最危险的地方。

C |          当然,也不能把掘金问题都甩给布劳恩一人,毕竟伤病对于一位年轻球员的影响不能忽视,从这个视角看,直接把布劳恩判定为垃圾合同,也有点早了。         只是从长远视角看,掘金确实需要担忧,对于布劳恩,他未来的成长上限到底在哪里呢?          当初掘金开出五年1.25亿,并非是买单当时的布劳恩,而是看好他的未来潜力。但如果后续没能稳定进步,那么这份合同的性价比自然下降了。

D |          特别是对比沃特森,合约问题就更明显了。

E |          二人都属于掘金养成的年轻侧翼,但沃特森身体条件更好,攻防潜力更大,在持球和外线威胁上都高于布劳恩,甚至也比布劳恩年轻。         但尴尬的是,在给布劳恩开出五年1.25亿后,掘金给沃特森的报价只有四年7800万,这个差距难免让人质疑。         在掘金视角下,如果沃特森只值7800万,那么布劳恩的五年1.25亿,自然就是垃圾合同了。

F |          所以,对于布劳恩和沃特森这两份合同,你如何评价呢?。

G |

Current article:http://www.hanninhuaxituochunkui.pics/news/20260826_349.ppt

Published on:14:46:27


相关文章
推荐图文
最热文章