流金岁月
Supreme Court Decision to Reverse Roe v. Wade to Galvanize Democrat Base Ahead of Midterms - Experts_我的网站
A | 近日春暖花开、气温回升 你是不是计划着 带上装备踏青赏花 再来个踩水捉虾？ 近日，中国疾控中心接连发布提醒 注意防范血吸虫一年四季都有可能感染血吸虫病 4-10月是最容易感染的时间 春夏感染风险更大 外出玩水需谨慎 谨防感染血吸虫病 什么是血吸虫病？ 血吸虫病是由血吸虫寄生于人或者哺乳动物引起的具有传染性、地方性和自然疫源性的寄生虫病，是一种呈全球流行的被忽视的热带寄生虫病。 Last week, the predominantly conservative US Supreme Court overruled the precedent established by the Roe v. Wade and decided that states may regulate the practice of abortion. The Roe v. Wade decision upheld pregnant women’s right to seek an abortion without government restrictions. A decision in the 1992 case of Planned Parenthood v. Casey largely upheld the Roe ruling.,Effect on Midterms,In November, US citizens will go to the polls in what will be the first midterm election of the Joe Biden administration as well as a referendum of sorts on the current US president's performance. The Republicans have been projected to win back the House of Representatives and the Senate as well, as the public has been increasingly frustrated by the issues such as inflation, crime, education and jobs. The recent ruling, however, could potentially give the democrats a shot in the arm by generating excitement among their voters.,"It will certainly galvanize the Democrats' base, for sure, it will help them to raise campaign funds and it may - perhaps - make some races more difficult for Republicans, especially in the suburbs among women voters," Robert Singh, a professor of politics at Birkbeck, University of London, said, adding that most voters will still be focused on other issues and he still expects the Republicans to win both houses of the Congress.,This sentiment was echoed by Ziad Munson, a sociology professor and the chair of the department of sociology and anthropology at Lehigh University in Pennsylvania, who also warned that the effect of the decision can be overstated.,"A consistent finding in political science over the last several decades is that the abortion issue, while a potent ideological symbol, seldom is a key policy issue for voters when they cast their votes," Munson explained.,Andrew Wroe, a senior lecturer in American politics at the University of Kent, agreed as well that the issue should help the Democrats, citing the effectiveness of the Republican use of cultural issues for rallying their base.,"The Democratic Party has been less successful in prosecuting the Culture Wars, but this is its great opportunity. Whether it will use it well is a different question, however," Wroe suggested.,At the same time, Christopher Kaczor, the chair of the philosophy department at Loyola Marymount University, is doubtful about the abortion issue having an impact on the US political landscape and helping Democrats to excite their voters.,"I expect that the very small minority of people for whom abortion is the key issue, on both sides, will be energized by this decision, but for most people other political and economic issues will remain more important," Kaczor stated.,New Wave of Protests?,The Supreme Court's decision has triggered a strong reaction on both sides of the issue in the United States, with hundreds of protesters, pro-life and pro-choice, gathering outside the Supreme Court last week following the decision. After the ruling, protests broke out in various US cities, showing a possibility of a nationwide backlash.,"People are angry, distraught, and ready to mobilise. It is difficult to say precisely how long the protests will persist, but it is likely to be some considerable time, given the magnitude of the policy change and the direct and indirect effects it will have on millions of people's lives," Wroe said.,Meanwhile, other experts expressed skepticism regarding the possibility of nationwide protests, including Munson, who drew attention to the fact that "the conservative majority tested for this possibility when they agreed not to stay the implementation of the Texas S.B. 8 law [also known as the Texas Heartbeat Act that bans abortion after detection of an unborn child's heartbeat] earlier this year.","Allowing that law to go into effect was the Court's political trial balloon, and it showed that widespread outrage quickly quieted down after just a few days. The outrage following the formal overturning of Roe v. Wade will last longer, but it is not likely to lead to large-scale consequential protest activity," the sociologist said.,Man Charged With Attempted Murder of LAPD Officers Amid Roe v Wade Protests26 June, 14:51 GMT,Who Judges the Justices?,Over the years, the role of courts in the US social and political life has greatly increased, with the Supreme Court becoming the final arbiter on many hot-button issues, such as same-sex marriage, gun control and abortion. This has been a prominent talking point among conservatives, who have been claiming that this practice undermines the country's constitutional principles, while liberals have been appealing to the notion of the courts standing up for human rights as well as drawing attention to the conservative movement's efforts to train and promote judges who share its principles.,"Both liberals and conservatives have always been supportive of judicial activism, they just want the judiciary to be activist in promoting the issues or outcomes that their side prefers. This despite the fact that conservatives have used 'judicial activism' as a talking point for some time," Munson pointed out.,Kaczor, for his part, drew a distinction between the original Roe decision and the Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, insisting that the latter actually corrects a case of judicial activism.,"The Dobbs decision is not accurately portrayed as a case of judicial activism, but rather as the reversal of judicial activism. It was Roe that established a constitutional right for abortion that had no basis in the text, history, or structure of the constitution. The decision of Dobbs undoes this judicial activism," he stated.,Nevertheless, the ruling by the current Supreme Court, which has three justices picked up by former President Donald Trump from a list compiled by the conservative legal organization Federalist Society, is likely to have the Democrats sour on the Supreme Court.,"Democrats are increasingly likely to start talking about illegitimate policy making by the Supreme Court. They will start to complain about judicial activism. But, as noted above, they can use these arguments to mobilize their base and to argue for urgency of electing more Democrats to the Senate, which of course must ratify presidential appointments to the Court," Wroe said, adding that the Democrats can also "begin to legitimately argue that the Senate has an in-built Republican advantage that needs to be addressed via constitutional change.",According to Singh, any Democratic nominee for the 2024 presidential race will face the pressure to commit to enlarging and reforming the Supreme Court.,"Whether that happens, though, is another matter. I doubt the Democrats will have sufficient seats in the Senate to overcome a GOP filibuster of court reform proposals. But the fact that the conservatives number six now on the Court sets up an on-going problem for Democrats, and more conflict to come," Singh concluded.。 我国流行的是由日本血吸虫感染引起的日本血吸虫病，属法定乙类传染病。
B | 如不及时治疗或未治愈，发展到晚期，肝脏等器官会受损，导致门静脉高压，出现肝脾肿大、腹水等症状，人会变得骨瘦如柴、肚大如鼓，因此也被称为“大肚子病”。 接触10秒即可感染 血吸虫是一种寄生于脊椎动物血管内的吸虫，又称裂体吸虫。能寄生于人体并致病的血吸虫主要有七种，即日本血吸虫、曼氏血吸虫、埃及血吸虫、间插血吸虫、湄公血吸虫、马来血吸虫和几内亚血吸虫。其中前三种分布最广泛、危害最严重。 血吸虫的发育分为虫卵、毛蚴、母胞蚴、子胞蚴、尾蚴、童虫及成虫共七个阶段，其中尾蚴是可以感染人体的阶段。尾蚴在水中接触到人的体表后可侵入人体。
C | 有实验证明，宿主动物只要接触尾蚴10秒，就可被感染。 吸血虫不同于血吸虫 人们说的吸血虫，常常指的是水蛭，又称蚂蟥，是一种以吸血或食腐肉为生的体外寄生虫。其体长、扁平，略呈纺锤形，前后有两个吸盘可附着于人和动物体表。水蛭生活在水田、河流、稻田、湖沼、沟渠和浅水污秽坑塘等处，在我国各地均有分布，种类很多。 如何预防血吸虫病？ 感染血吸虫的直接原因是接触了含有血吸虫尾蚴的水体（疫水）。因此，不接触可能含有血吸虫尾蚴的水体、安全用水是避免感染的关键。 当生产和生活必须接触疫水时，可以通过穿戴防护用品（胶手套、胶鞋、胶衣、胶裤等）、涂抹防护霜（剂）、预防性服药来预防感染血吸虫。
D | 若感染如何治疗？ 当不可避免地接触了疫水，出现了发热等症状或脱离水体一个月后，应主动及时到血吸虫病防治机构或疾病预防控制机构进行检查以便诊断和治疗。 如果确认感染，吡喹酮是目前唯一在血吸虫病流行区广泛使用的高效、低毒、使用方便的口服抗血吸虫药物。服药时应谨遵医嘱，加强随访。 眼下正值春暖花开之际 出游务必做好防护！ （中国小康网微信公众号综合北京日报、中国疾控中心、广州日报、扬子晚报） 图源：网络 编辑：武金洋 审核：田苑淯颖。
Current article:http://www.hanninhuaxituochunkui.pics/news/20260826_778.xlsx
Published on:09:10:04
